One dashboard for everything
Flock OS and Axon Fusus pull plate readers, live camera feeds and body cams into a single police dashboard.8 Flock was valued at $7.5 billion in 2025.3
This introduction reads your browser's details locally to show what any website can see. Nothing is sent anywhere. Press Enter, click or press Escape to continue.
Private companies now sell cities networks that record where every car goes, who searched for it, and when. Most people never got a vote.
Everything on this page is real and sourced. Red tags link to the reporting. The only made-up parts are the simulated plate scan and the terminal flavour text, and both are labelled.
Flock OS and Axon Fusus pull plate readers, live camera feeds and body cams into a single police dashboard.8 Flock was valued at $7.5 billion in 2025.3
Cameras log the plate, make, colour and features of every passing car.3 Flock's Nova platform reportedly draws on 20 data sources to connect vehicles to people.6
Researchers and 404 Media found at least 60 Flock pan-tilt-zoom cameras exposed on the open internet. Flock blamed a misconfiguration.83
In Roseville, California, 71% of 1,427 stolen or felony vehicle alerts in 2023–24 were wrong. In Florida, a woman was held 13 days after a misread plate.3
A Washington Post investigation found 50+ officers charged or accused of misuse. One Georgia chief allegedly searched for his ex and her teenage daughter about 600 times.91
Flock has no ICE contract, but local police ran 4,000+ nationwide lookups tied to federal or immigration requests.4 In Mountain View, 250+ outside agencies ran an estimated 600,000 searches.6
Flock says it has 200+ drone customers. Drones launch from rooftop docks to reach 911 calls, often arriving before officers.11
Plate readers don't need your face. Your car goes everywhere you go. Each pass is stored with time, place and a description of the vehicle, and anyone with access can search it.
Flock says its readers "do not use facial recognition or identify who is inside a vehicle," and that it's cutting default retention from 30 days to 7.1 Who else can search the data depends on sharing settings, which some cities found switched on without their knowledge.6
A Texas officer searched 6,809 Flock networks, more than 83,000 cameras, with the logged reason "had an abortion, search for female."5
Flock and the Johnson County Sheriff said she was a missing person and it was about her safety. EFF says the documents contradict that.5
Flock data from Danville, Illinois was queried more than 4,000 times between June 2024 and May 2025 by agencies across dozens of states, many acting on informal requests from federal agents, with reasons logged like "ICE" and "ICE WARRANT."4
Danville denied its own officers ran immigration searches. Flock says it has no direct contract with ICE.6
Dayton found its Flock data had been hit by more than 7,000 immigration-related searches from outside agencies, against city policy. It suspended the program, covered all 72 cameras, and called in an outside firm to audit.30
A vendor issue silently re-enabled nationwide search access despite a "California only" setting. The city suspended the program.6
A class action alleges federal and out-of-state agencies queried city cameras more than 1.6 million times in seven months.6
These are allegations in a lawsuit, not findings.
Amazon's Ring ended its planned Flock integration after backlash over a Super Bowl ad.10
The privacy regulator found Bunnings ran facial recognition on every customer entering 63 stores from 2018 to 2021 - likely hundreds of thousands of people.18
On appeal in Feb 2026 the tribunal overturned the unlawful-collection finding, but upheld that Bunnings failed to tell shoppers it was happening.19
The regulator found Kmart's facial recognition - used in 28 stores from 2020 to 2022 to catch refund fraud, capturing everyone who walked in - was unlawful: indiscriminate and out of proportion to the problem.22
The regulator found Clearview AI - more than 3 billion images scraped from the web - breached the Privacy Act, and that the AFP used its free trial on real people without the privacy assessment the law required.2324
The Court of Appeal ruled South Wales Police's live facial recognition unlawful - too much discretion over watchlists, a deficient impact assessment, no proper bias check.25
It did not ban the technology. The force fixed the paperwork and resumed deployments.25
Shaun Thompson, an anti-knife-crime volunteer, was wrongly matched by a Met camera near London Bridge, held for almost 30 minutes and pressed for his fingerprints. He called it "stop and search on steroids."26
In April 2026 the High Court dismissed his challenge - it found the Met's policy lawful, not that the match was right.27
A 62-year-old woman was wrongly flagged as a shoplifter by facial recognition at a Home Bargains in Romford over a 39p pack of paracetamol. Staff searched her bag and told her she was banned. She says she took nothing.28
Britain has no law written specifically for facial recognition. When the ICO assessed the main retail vendor, Facewatch, in 2023, it let the system continue but said it must be used proportionately.29
If you're going to argue this, know the other side. These are the strongest points from supporters of plate readers and facial recognition, and you'll hear them at any council meeting.
Look up cameras near you on the crowdsourced DeFlock map or EFF's Atlas of Surveillance, and add any that are missing.
Most cancellations happened at ordinary council votes when a contract came up for renewal.7 Ask who can search the data, how long it's kept, and when the last audit was.
EFF and the ACLU in the US, Digital Rights Watch in Australia, and Liberty in the UK.
Try help, facts, au, grid, act, or blackout.